Follow-up from my Response to WWC Overview & Scrutiny Review

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

I’m told that tomorrow, Worcester News are publishing an Article relating to my original review on the Overview and Scrutiny Panel that i previously posted (Here) – The comments made to the Paper were made a while ago now, in a typically un-timley manner, since I that time i have been fortunate to gain some more information…In light of this, i’m adding my follow-up that i wrote after a good discussion about the intentions behind the WCC Outcomes. I’ll go further in to it, and i really hope to work with the Worc’s Health and Care Trust directly to smooth out some of these issues, however, in the meantime, here are my (as yet unedited) ramblings.

x x x x x x x x

On Friday I was lucky enough to meet with the Children’s Clinical Services Manager, who is the lead of the Umbrella Pathway, I say lucky as it was nice to be able to get a meeting with someone who has influence over the decisions that impact on us every day within Worcestershire. It shouldn’t be down to luck, however, my professional position blurred things slightly and I think, initially, it felt to my colleague as more of an ambush. That was of course not my intention at all, and perhaps due to my own formal manner (an ASD trait of mine), my contact came across as one thing, rather than another. However, ambush or not, the intent was true and as a Parent who is impacted by decisions made and/or signed off by the LD Lead for Children’s Services, it was an opportunity that I grabbed fully.

The one big issue that came out of the meeting is that of funding, of course it’s funding.

The CCG are telling the Trust what they need to do and where to make savings. This is fine, as the CCG hold the pot of money, but how much push-back is given when this decision is not the best one for the Trust or it’s Service Users? If the Trust go along blindly without due consideration for those they serve in a medical and care capacity, then how can we parents know that the children are safe in their hands? When something comes down to funding, corners are eventually cut. In this case, the WCC have put a case forward in their Overview and Scrutiny Panel Report that highlights to me, where these cuts are being put in, without an idea of the future and ongoing cost implications of trying to change the process for the worse here, at this early stage of accessing an assessment.

I’d like to see the figures, it seems sensible that the figures to back up the changes to an existing process are shared to enable transparency.

The figures I’m interested in is that of the existing ‘pot of money’ and how it is divvied up along the ‘pathway’. I was interested to learn and surprised actually, that there is no one pot of money for the umbrella pathway. It is not held specifically for the Autism Process in either the Trust Mental Health Services, or Learning Disability services. It is allocated to each individual team that has involvement and inputs in to the assessment process. This doesn’t make any sense to me, and it is information that needs exploring further.

In terms of finances and value for money, it also seems sensible that we get an overview of the total cost of a child going through the current pathway, who is paid what, when?

I would personally like to see this, so I can assess whether the current pathway is good value for money, and from a parent’s perspective, pull out the unnecessary elements of the pathway and make way for the parts that need more emphasis placing on them.

It is my opinion, and until I have actual costs I can only speculate, that the current process of following the NHS Pathway is far more ineffective and less financially viable than a parent who manages to go down the Private Assessment route. As a ballpark figure, a Private Assessment might cost a parent £2000 – £3000 to obtain a thorough assessment by an Expert Paediatrician, Clinical Psychologist and/or Speech and Language Therapist. These are experts in their field as many have reached a senior level in the NHS and left the public sector to pursue Private Practice and provide a more focussed Neurodevelopmental service. In that Assessment, everything that is considered over months and years by the NHS pathway, is also considered but in a more appropriate setting, nothing is left out, there are no short cuts in the Assessment process Private or Public. And yet, the time taken is better for the family, it is accurate as carried out by Neurodevelopmental specialists and the relevant issues are measured accordingly, allowing the Specialists to join the dots and lot sooner and make a more accurate opinion, unlike the current fragmented NHS process carried out by ‘jack and Jill’s of all trades’ in terms of Children’s health where problems occur in several professional holding subjective opinions and the facts get lost amongst the ‘dot to dot’. And how much does each one of these appointments cost to carry out (time, admin, paperwork, professional, room hire, rates etc)? I wonder if the whole process was totted up, how much would that be? And then add in the extra pressures that can arise from not having an assessment at all or making incorrect allegations of parenting issues etc, then these costs (again room hire, professionals time, cost of running a triple p course, contacting social services, implementing safeguarding staff?) and then consider the cost absorbed by schools and nurseries (staff, meetings, time out of classroom) and EHCP tribunals and all that goes in to these, and then there is picking up the tab on mental health treatment for those suffering additional anxiety, depression, PTSD and medicating these symptoms? Would all of this really be cheaper than listening and believing the parents with regards to the severity of the ASD symptoms; cheaper than the voice of a second opinion by an expert Specialist, and offering the best diagnostic assessment possible in the very first place?

Secondly, I feel it is important to note that I felt more comforted by the information I gained about the report that I thought I would. Something that is apparent is the language in the report and that the emphasis of the report is based on parenting. According to the Service Lead, the push for support is coming from the Schools and not the parents; this surprised me, as it isn’t mentioned.

Through all of the interventions and graduated responses mentioned in the report, they do not focus on the additional support in schools, it does not focus on the Teachers pushing for additional funding to sustain the classroom support that is required when a child has a (potential) Autism condition, and it does focus on Parenting issues, behaviour difficulties, and an array of other diagnostic labels, than actually once joined together could quite easily be a case of ASD PDA.

If the focus is not on a diagnosis, or a label, then why go ahead and look for other labels – as if the Autism one is off-limits?

My concerns remain, as the new focus on alleviating the front door pressure of a struggling system is not going to resolve the fact that the children still need an expert assessment – of which I am not convinced they get through the current pathway. The lack of understanding about accessing support is rife, and the wider public and professionals need to understand the consequences of NOT diagnosing an Autism Condition. The fall-out is emotional to family, and ultimately financial to the Public services, when incorrect diagnoses are made or unmade, and the families end up fighting the system through courts, be it child protection cases, Education Tribunals, follow-up health care for traumatised youngsters and families who have been impacted negatively by their experiences of the route that took them to the courts in the first place.

We know that the Local Authority have limited budgets, yet the schools are asking for help which isn’t being implemented and this concern isn’t being shared amongst parents. The money spent by the Local Authority fighting back at Parents, could be better spent in giving that support required. And how do we know someone needs support? We assess, diagnose and believe parents.

In PMQs on Weds 22nd Feb, Theresa May PM answered a question surrounding Learning Disabilities and she said that the Government “will be introducing Education, Health and Care Plans”, and my question to her is, why “introducing” and not acknowledge that they actually ALREADY exist and are like fairy dust to obtain? And if the Government are taking an active role in pushing the EHCPs, how do they expect to provide them to children who have not had an assessment?

This topic of ‘assessment versus diagnosis versus need’ is too vague for parents, teachers and children who are growing to adults as we speak.

If the schools need support, they should get it, if the parents need support they should get it, early intervention is key – the Trust gets that right at least, however, their perception of what early intervention is, what form it takes, and who can access it, is drastically off the mark.

Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

Overview & Scrutiny Committee: Autism Assessments in Worcestershire

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

Response to: Worcestershire County Council’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee on Autism.

Scrutin Committee 28.2.18 Assessment of Children and Young People who may have Autism

With reference to the Review document attached, I appreciate that there are more referrals for ASD coming to light than ever before, and I, more than most, can be cynical about the extent of suspected ASD being banded around. I admit that I am protective of the ‘label’ that gets my 5 year old son his support and, as a late diagnosed adult; I hold my hands up to being blunt in regards to ASD and what that truly means especially when it coexists with another medical or learning disability.

The report suggests various reasons for increased referral rates, the first being increased awareness. This is a good thing, without a doubt – it means people can start understanding the variety of Autism Conditions and know what to look out for in their own children. This should not in any way be acted upon negatively, which unfortunately Worcestershire County Council does in their Overview and Scrutiny Committee outcome on ASD.

Another reason for increased referrals, apparently there is  “anecdotal evidence that some people may incorrectly believe it acts as an automatic ‘gateway’ to support and services” How can they reference subjective opinion as evidence without quantifying it?

The problem here is when a parent asks for help with their ASD child, they think that there must be some support and help available, but in actual fact, there is not and this is down to the Local Authority. Parents are at their whit’s end fighting everyone to get them to understand and they, as I did, naively think that someone can help, when the truth is, parents are on their own. This ‘gateway’ to support is a mystical one that does not exist, and services that are impossible to access with a child who has a High Functioning Autism Condition

I’m concerned about the content of the report, but the recommendations made actually frighten me. WCC state they will look for alternative reasons, and to use approaches and interventions for ASD, and this is a worry, as it appears that no lessons have been learnt since the experience we had, and instead the Authorities have taken a massive step backwards for all Invisible Disabilities, particularly High-Functioning ones including Autism.

The long term impact on undiagnosed children and adults is obvious to those of us that live with the condition, and although I feel very sad that this outcome will leave more high functioning autistic people at risk of other medical conditions as a result, such as increased anxiety and depression, the impact on their ‘apparent’ ability to cope in education and the fall-out of them not fulfilling their potential in to adulthood which will ultimately have its own cost implications to the NHS and Local Authorities, it is not this that concerns me most.

I’m massively worried about the impact of the decision to start looking to ‘courses’ as a resolution for the symptoms, as this will not work. They do not offer the support needed and they do not fix ASD symptoms, in fact in a case of Pathological Demand Avoidance these types of ‘approaches’ can create a very unhappy and unwell child as a result.

The main recommendation from the report is based totally on weeding out the cases that will not meet their own criteria and looking to place the blame at any door, other than that of the Autism Pathway. What about the cases who have genuine High Functioning, invisible disability that can only be extracted by an Expert Professional? There is no excuse to cherry pick who gets an assessment and who does not. These are children with individual needs. In what other condition, would it ever be acceptable to not diagnose? It is absolutely unacceptable to put one child’s disability over another, simply because it is too expensive to sustain the current processes in place.

Parents face a continuing struggle with the NHS to be listened to and believed as it is, leading to increasing referrals to Social Services. Child Protection interventions begin when a parent is accused, (wrongly) as I was, of Fabrication and Inducing Illness (previous Munchausen’s by Proxy).

We hear a lot of parents talk about long waiting times for Autism Assessments, ASD Diagnoses, and the battle to gain support. My experience is that in order to even access a fair assessment, a diagnosis, the educational and emotional support that should follow for children, parents are treated like perpetrators of some abuse or worse, treated like they don’t have the knowledge or ability to pick out ‘ordinary’ and ‘unusual’ behaviours in their own children. An ask for help for an undiagnosed child leads to judgements on parenting and worse. This is how important accessing an early, correct and expert diagnosis is in terms of the support available. It is not true that the support is offered on needs of the child, because those needs are put down to other aspects of behaviour, it is true however, that the support offered is a way of teasing out parental issues, using archaic attitudes and parenting strategies which in fact makes the whole assessment process unbearable for child and family.


Review Paperwork and meeting details can be found here:  http://worcestershire.moderngov.co.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=134&MId=2165&Ver=4

Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

Accused: an Autism Mother images

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

 


Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

Get our voices heard: Fundraising

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

Dear all

I am on an Autism mission. I am crowdfunding for a Creative Public Engagement project. I am compiling the stories and the battles that need to be shared and desperately need to be heard by the public and by the Professionals. To do this i need a few things…fuel, coffee, printing, time and space. I need to maintain a presence, online and in person…and i need buy people tea, cake and the freedom to share their experiences of Autism & Invisible Disabilities, and the challenges it presents.

I need to continue the work i am doing and need to get the Parent Voice heard.

This project is already in existence and currently in its infancy. It’s supported with confidence by Artrix, Arts Council England and Worcestershire County Council as an offshoot of my Exhibition Accused: an Autism Mother. The idea has legs and an ability to share similar stories across many sectors and many a diverse group of families, this is a massively important part of what my work is…sharing and exposing truths and allowing the silenced, the shamed, the innocent and hurt an opportunity to have their voices heard by the wider world.

I am no self-promoter and i rarely admit i need support, and i never ask for any kind of help…until now. I am so passionate about this work and the importance of sharing our joint experiences, that i have started a Not for Profit company to make this awareness project go as far as it possibly can…it would be amazing if you could find something/anything to donate to add to the Breakfast Tree pot for Public Awareness and Engagement.

Thank you, fantastic people

Bernadette

If you would rather give anonymously you can do so here at my Just Giving page

 

 

 

Here is the link to the Artrix Exhibition Accused: an Autism Mother 

 

Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

Mommy’s Christmas Book of things…Thanks for everything, NHS, CDT, Aryu, Parsuns, fuckwits

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

I felt the need to publish this now…i started a Christmas book last year for recipes, crafts, cuttings, lists etc…I couldn’t face it. I had a list of veg to buy/make like Red Cabbage & Cinnamon carrots – but that’s as far as it got. My heart was breaking, my eyes were constantly sore and puffy and i was aching in my gut like nothing else i had ever experienced. Merry fucking christmas you bastard accusing waste of space cunts, you ruined my family’s Christmas…my partner and i saved it for the boys. I don’t know how we managed..but we did. For them. The boys you could have had put in to Local Authority care…Thanks for being so royally shit at your jobs. I keep reminding myself that i WAS RIGHT all along, in EVERYTHING that i did. I was right, and YOU, yes YOU..Aryu, Parsuns, Garbutt, NHS, were wrong! Damaging & wrong.

img_4707

24/12/15

This years christmas couldnot have been worse –
I had hopes of keeping this book as an ongoing xmas to do/ memory
Traditional list of things

NO it’s been been Been Ruined
By me
Social Services –
NHS –
Wankstains cannot do their jobs so blame Me.
Us. Putting us through this shit shit SHIT

To my family      Man, Boy, Toddle
I am so sorry. I wanted so much for this Christmas- we’ve tried to put on a brave face – I Love You. X
Next year will be better. I hope xxxx

img_4706

Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

ACCUSED: An Autism Mother – the Art Exhibition

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

So here it is, the exhibition is now live and official.

artrix-logo‘ACCUSED: AN AUTISM MOTHER’ at the Artrix Arts Centre February 2017.

Supported by Arts Council England and Worcestershire County Council

img_20160820_1849162

Exhibition:
ACCUSED: An Autism Mother
Bernadette Louise creates a spectacle of oversized Healthcare posters emphasising the ‘invisible’ symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder, Pathological Demand Avoidance. In an honest response to the Authorities who accused her of Fabricating and Inducing her Son’s ASD, she uses documentary mobile phone images and direct quotes from the assessment process to highlight a desperate need for PDA Awareness. Quickly the professionals focussed on her as Mother, instead of the Child’s symptoms they were faced with. Bernadette intends to highlight the contradictions and accusations that caused the NHS to refer to Children’s Services resulting in a Child Protection
order. Through her Art and Spoken Word event Bernadette exposes the true harm caused by the Authorities to families with ‘unseen disabilities’.

Spoken word event:
An evening of poetry and spoken word including performances by those who are on and support people on the Autism Spectrum. Featuring the popular Autism Vlogger, ‘Autistic Genius’ and visceral Artist Bernadette Louise.

grant_png_black

wcc-logo

artrix-logo

Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

Vic Derbyshire show brief mention of FII & Child Abuse in Fatigue feature

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

THIS SHOW NEEDS TO START TAKING NOTICE OF WHAT IS GOING ON WITH PARENTS OF UNSEEN DISABILITIES

C’mon….It is about time that they responded to one of my emails and actually decided to break the silence and help families realise that they are not alone with the horrible and INCORRECT allegations of child abuse that arise from the healthcare servcies who do not see the invisible conditions. YES that person who spoke about fatigue and ME was right (post edit: Jane Colby of Tymes Trust), if something that the health professional suggests doesn’t work, (in this case it was discussing CBT with Chronic fatigue) they automatically assume that the parent has another agenda, a disgraceful and lazy accusation of Munchausen’s by Proxy. It is tearing families apart and it is not only with Fatigue as per the feature on the show just. IT IS WITH AUTISM. AND IT HAS HAPPENED TO ME, MY PARTNER AND OUR CHILDREN! No harm was found, after a hell of a time. Yet, it was gutwrenching and unfair.. and no one has apologised for being WRONG.

Please can someone pick up this story??? Much more needs to be done urgently to lift this overwhelming shadow that the NHS and Children’s Services place on innocent and incredibly caring parents.

Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

ACCUSED: Autism. The Art Exhibition about PDA

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

 

After a while of not posting, not being greatly social media sociable, i have decided to update on why and what’s been going down. I have had a temporary break from dealing with the NHS complaint and have been working on my art. This is good and bad. Having a break from the complaint doesn’t mean it has gone away or been at the back of my mind. Far from it. Not working on it has caused me more stress and made me have less focus on the things i need to do. I am constantly thinking about the way in which the complaint has been handled and what an abomination the whole situation was and is, and i NEED to fight them still. No matter how lacking in motivation i become, i still think about the things i should be doing. Trawling through all of the NHS and Social Services lies and defamation is traumatic, it is emotionally hard work and i would rather not be doing it. However, i cannot let them free of the burden they caused my family and will persist. Even if it is at the expense of my own health and wellbeing. They already did enough to scupper that anyway, so what’s a little more of a battering?

So in my break from the complaint, i have placed my energy on a project not too far removed from it and it is my art exhibition. The exhibition is about Autism Awareness, but not as you know it. It is a PDA awareness project, and a parental blame project. It is a tangible backlash and two fingers up at the NHS and the way in which they dismissed the very symptoms of PDA and blamed us parents for the issues. This is the reason for AWARENESS and it doesn’t stop at just reading a bit about PDA, it is about respecting parents enough to realise they are genuine and aware people themselves.

bl-accusedThe work is based on the ‘Invisible’ symptoms of PDA. It also highlights direct quotes lifted from the notes and information i have from the NHS…that in itself makes a hugely interesting read.

There it is.

ACCUSED: Autism
by Bernadette Louise

The exhibition is funded. It has backing from Arts Council England and Worcestershire County Council. And it is taking place within the very geographic region that harmed us, Redditch and Bromsgrove. The Artrix Arts Centre in February 2017. It isn’t that long away, and i am finally getting to grips with the content, but i have a lot to do and a lot to organise. I also have to be a parent and a partner, so the NHS idiots can wait a little while longer while i attempt to carry on with my life.

If anyone would like to contribute to a piece of work, i am running a public facing engagement project and would love to include your experiences too. Please do contact me if you would like to know more about that or any part of the work.

Photo by Mac James 2016.

grant_png_black

 

 

 

wcc-logo

 

 

 

Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

Sign the Petition

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

NHS & Social Services Understand parents of Autism/PDA Pathological Demand Avoidance

Please follow the link and sign my petition for ASD/PDA recognition by the Local Authorities and NHS Teams we deal with daily as parents. I am petitioning against the Parent-Blaming culture that is rampant amongst ‘Professionals’ and want to draw more attention to the actual impact their actions have on families

logo_change

https://www.change.org/p/alistair-burt-mp-nhs-social-services-understand-parents-of-autism-pda-pathological-demand-avoidance?recruiter=533936555&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink

Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

Letter to our MP re NHS & Children Services #ASD #PDA

Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail

 

 

I’m publishing a Blog Safe version of a letter I wrote to our local MP following the Child Protection order placed on my Children.

I feel that even though this is a brief encounter with the reality of what we as a family have gone through in recent months, it perfectly summarises the injustice of this case, the way the local authorities are in cahoots and the blatant nepotism that occurs within small-town Local Authority/NHS teams and the ‘Higher Powers’ they believe they hold.

 

 

I love this opening statement by Lydia Lunch in her autobiographical book ‘Paradoxia’

IMG_3182

But, in this instance, I feel I still need to protect my beautiful little family from more shit.

Not sure how this is going to work…I’m taking out names and replacing them with professional titles. I am definitely not doing this to protect the people who caused us harm. I will be getting to them in due course, don’t worry. Where I talk of the children, I will talk of The Boy and Toddle (bearing in mind this whole thing only came about because of the lack of diagnosis for the Boy and Toddle is only affected by the ridiculous accusations of is parents being accused on FII, so in turn is clearly afflicted too.)

I will however state to print that the teams I am referring to are:
Redditch and Bromsgrove Child Development Team
Worcestershire County Council Children’s Services
Redditch Early Help Hub

Our MP has been really helpful, and I met with her about this issue. She didn’t rush me, she let me take as long as i needed and she listened to what I said. Regardless of the Political Party, and how some of their decisions impact on our lives personally, I actually like her quite a lot. She did contact the services on my behalf adding weight to my complaint, but having had a very lame reply from Children’s Services, and still being stuck on Child Protection after a postponed Conference Review, I need to chase this up.

Letter Begins:

Dear Our Local MP

I have asked to meet with you regarding a Section 47 Child Protection Order that my children have been placed on. This is due to the so-called “significant emotional harm” that I have been inflicting on them. They have claimed that I am guilty of Fabrication and Induction of Illness (previously referred to Munchausen’s by Proxy). This has devastated me and my partner and the allegations are far from true. I am sure this is an obvious thing to say but the very fact is that we have proof to disprove this NHS/Social Services allegation and it is being disregarded by Social Services Manager without thorough investigation.

Firstly, the referral to Social Services was made by an Occupational Therapist we had been in contact with regarding my son’s behavioural and sensory difficulties. The Child Development Team claimed that The Boy was a normal 3 year old boy and they were not seeing the difficulties described at home. The strategy meeting held by Social Services was only attended by NHS ‘professionals’ and Early help hub representative who we had never met and no one who was able to defend our corner in our absence. They were all singing from the same hymn sheet as they all work in the same team, none of whom are experts in ASD/PDA. The team had previously decided that:

Quote CDT Meeting 4/11/15 – All

“ All agree that The Boy does not meet the criteria for Autistic Spectrum Disorder including PDA (Pathological Demand Avoidance). Presentation: Significant anxiety issues. No developmental difficulties. Mild expressive language delay and delay in attention skills.” 

There are many issues with this and i have placed a complaint against the NHS staff involved with PALS, as they have clearly highlighted the areas of difficulty that The Boy presents, but have not attributed them to the very condition that we felt prevalent. Autism Spectrum Disorder/Pathological Demand Avoidance. There are many instances that the ‘professionals’ have misplaced the blame for The Boy’s difficulties and we have had to defend our parenting and motives. I have evidence that the NHS have been seeing the difficulties and the symptoms they described themselves are perfectly befitting of an ASD/PDA diagnosis. But PDA variant is rarely diagnosed and less prominent than both Aspergers, and what is now called ‘Classic Autism’. The team work to a fixed criteria and have aligned The Boy’s difficulties with parenting and particularly my own mental health condition.

The final NHS ‘diagnosis’ of The Boy not meeting the criteria should in fact be discredited as i understand it it is not NICE Compliant as there was no present Consultant for The Boy and no Psychologist present at the the CDT meeting where the decision was made.

I have also since found out that in the NICE guidelines, it is the duty of the NHS professionals to feed this ‘diagnosis/or lack of’ in person to the family. Instead, the meeting went ahead, with an Early Help Worker present, who then was the person, who whilst i was arguing our case on the phone with her, was insisting that The Boy DOES NOT have anything wrong with him. That is what and how i was told, and a good few weeks later did we get the minutes in the post from the CDT meeting telling me the NHS position on diagnosis.

Secondly, the Social Services accepted a referral, not investigating that the person who is responsible for deciding a case of Fabrication/infliction (FII), the Paediatric Consultant, was in fact Dr H.A, the only Consultant in Redditch & Bromsgrove, someone who i have previously made a personal and professional complaint about. Who we now know is also the Safeguarding Manager. I would have thought that this Consultant could not have been able to make an informed and impartial decision about whether or not to make a complaint to Social Services and should have referred to an equally senior manager?

Thirdly, and most importantly, The Social Services are now trying to discredit Private Assessments and subsequent diagnosis that The Boy does in fact have High Functioning Autism, PDA variant that were made by two highly respected experts in the field of ASD/PDA. Social Services are accepting NHS opinion over Private simply because it contradicts their initial accusations.

I have shared the very thorough reports with Social Services and they are trying to say they hold little/or no weight as they, in their words “have two conflicting medical opinions”. My argument is that they don’t. The NHS opinion is not Expert, and it is not (as far as i can tell) NICE compliant. They have ignored the root cause of The Boy’s anxiety without expertly investigating PDA symptoms and totally forgotten about the sensory, speech & social delay issues they themselves highlighted.

The Social Services report for the first Conference on 17th December, is a disgusting, discriminating accusation of FII. They have torn apart every facet of my personality to try and make it fit an FII case. The report focuses on Fabrication, and the “gain” i get from this, but the Conference focussed on the anxiety of The Boy, and that it was Inflicted on him. I am yet to see which is the most prominent issue they are following as i do not believe both can co-exist. If i were fabricating it, there is no evidence that i am “gaining” anything from this. And it is not possible to “induce/inflict” ASD on anyone. They have included my One Year old son in this who they have never encountered, and who has no difficulties. The Social Services are not medical and they are relying on the NHS opinion and taking their word. And why? We have disproved the allegation of Fabrication. But the social services are unwilling to accept this, making our next conference on 17th March, essentially the same meeting as before, the NHS will all have their vote when none have been involved for months and we’ll still be accused of FII.

The Social Services have been lacking in communication with us, they have not done what they said they would, they have misinterpreted things we have audio recordings of, it goes on.

Questions to you:

  1. Your opinion on Private Assessments and Diagnosis? is it worth less than NHS? When the Government are trying to push for privatisation of services, why, when we do go Private and call in very expert opinions, does it hold less weight with a Local Government Team such as Social Services?
  2. At a Child Protection Conference why does every individual involved in the CDT get a single vote and not a Team vote? e.g. if 2 staff from The Boy’s nursery attend the CP Conference they get only one vote, likewise if two Homestart staff attend, they would only get one vote. So why  is it acceptable that the NHS get several votes when they work together on the same diagnosis?
  3. A CP Conference Chair that is supposed to be impartial but is actually an ex-social worker working for the very same county council that are taking section 47 action against us?
  4. The assumption of guilt within the first Report, Conference and following Child Protection Plan. The recommendations were put in place to actually prohibit us from clearing our name and getting the correct diagnosis in order to help The Boy’s wellbeing.

Letter Ends.

So, i don’t know why i need to post this, i just feel that if i start posting all the correspondence that relate to this insane case, maybe i’ll feel that i have some online account rather than just my massive and ever expanding folders and living inside my own head with the burden of the injustice.

Follow meFacebooktwitteryoutubeFacebooktwitteryoutube
Share this articleFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwittermail